<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Martini &#8211; Stirred, not Shaken</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/martini-stirred-not-shaken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/martini-stirred-not-shaken/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=martini-stirred-not-shaken</link>
	<description>Simply Refined</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pulvirent</title>
		<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/martini-stirred-not-shaken/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pulvirent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesimplyrefined.com/stirred-not-shaken-2/#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to offend any vodka-lovers out there, but a vodka martini just seems pointless to me.  Plymouth does make an amazing, and admittedly the original, martini, but just isn&#039;t my personal favorite.  Hendricks makes a nice soft, floral martini, Beefeater a more crisp, citrus forward martini, and the Berry&#039;s No. 3 has an astounding finish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The No. 3 isn&#039;t available in the States yet, but I had a chance to sample it at Berry&#039;s whilst in London over the summer, and although a bit pricier than most gins, a fine treat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to offend any vodka-lovers out there, but a vodka martini just seems pointless to me.  Plymouth does make an amazing, and admittedly the original, martini, but just isn&#39;t my personal favorite.  Hendricks makes a nice soft, floral martini, Beefeater a more crisp, citrus forward martini, and the Berry&#39;s No. 3 has an astounding finish.</p>
<p>The No. 3 isn&#39;t available in the States yet, but I had a chance to sample it at Berry&#39;s whilst in London over the summer, and although a bit pricier than most gins, a fine treat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/martini-stirred-not-shaken/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesimplyrefined.com/stirred-not-shaken-2/#comment-180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post, and thank you for upholding the gin not vodka tradition. The whole idea of something called a vodka martini is an abomination.  Your choice of Hendricks, though, is a bit odd.  Particularly since you didn&#039;t mention Plymouth, the gin the inventor of the martini had in mind.  Hendricks is a tough gin for a fairly &quot;straight up&quot; cocktail, in my opinion.  Still, you did say it was your choice.  I had never heard of Berry Bros. No. 3 and as I see looking it up, it&#039;s fairly new.  Probably not even available here in the States.  Would love to try it, however.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prosit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, and thank you for upholding the gin not vodka tradition. The whole idea of something called a vodka martini is an abomination.  Your choice of Hendricks, though, is a bit odd.  Particularly since you didn&#39;t mention Plymouth, the gin the inventor of the martini had in mind.  Hendricks is a tough gin for a fairly &quot;straight up&quot; cocktail, in my opinion.  Still, you did say it was your choice.  I had never heard of Berry Bros. No. 3 and as I see looking it up, it&#39;s fairly new.  Probably not even available here in the States.  Would love to try it, however.</p>
<p>Prosit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
