<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Lasting&quot; Luxury</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lasting-luxury</link>
	<description>Simply Refined</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pulvirent</title>
		<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pulvirent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury-2/#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. L.,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First off, as for deleting your previous comment, I initially interpreted it as confrontational instead of constructive, and I apologize if I misunderstood your intentions.  This may have been amplified by the following comment (also deleted) which essentially accused me of being a fascist in response to what I considered a fairly tame remark…go figure.  I am in no way for a white-washed view of any subject, and I appreciate your desire to create dialogue if that was your intention.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now to the crux of the seeming disagreement: while I encourage individuality and freedom of dress, evidenced I think quite well in my dressing differently than the social norm, the particular instance (brunch) was one in which I felt the individuals&#039; choices demonstrated a lack of respect for the venue and the other guests.  Many of the guests dressed in the manner I found objectionable also behaved in a manner I found to be objectionable - whether this is a case of &quot;correlation does not imply causation&quot; is certainly up in the air, but I&#039;m sure this had something to do with my reaction.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of the day, I would obviously prefer a gentleman in a T-Shirt over a barbarian in a tie, but in this particular instance those dressed in what I consider appropriate garb for a Sunday Brunch at a nice hotel restaurant (admittedly, according to some possibly anachronistic idea of propriety), seemed to give me no reason to bat an eye, whilst those dressed in what I would consider disrespectful attire for the setting continued this perceived disrespect in their actions as well, amplifying the effect for me.  T-Shirt or Suit, there is no excuse for cutting in front of a lady in line, swearing loudly in public, or treating hotel staff disrespectfully.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Condescension was certainly not, and never is, my intention, and I do honestly appreciate your desire to set the record straight here and figure this thing out.  I hope this has shed some light on why I said what I said, and why although I do not mean it in the way in which it may have been interpreted, I do mean the underlying point quite strongly: respect is important and is never anachronistic, no matter how it is dressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. L.,</p>
<p>First off, as for deleting your previous comment, I initially interpreted it as confrontational instead of constructive, and I apologize if I misunderstood your intentions.  This may have been amplified by the following comment (also deleted) which essentially accused me of being a fascist in response to what I considered a fairly tame remark…go figure.  I am in no way for a white-washed view of any subject, and I appreciate your desire to create dialogue if that was your intention.</p>
<p>Now to the crux of the seeming disagreement: while I encourage individuality and freedom of dress, evidenced I think quite well in my dressing differently than the social norm, the particular instance (brunch) was one in which I felt the individuals&#39; choices demonstrated a lack of respect for the venue and the other guests.  Many of the guests dressed in the manner I found objectionable also behaved in a manner I found to be objectionable &#8211; whether this is a case of &quot;correlation does not imply causation&quot; is certainly up in the air, but I&#39;m sure this had something to do with my reaction.  </p>
<p>At the end of the day, I would obviously prefer a gentleman in a T-Shirt over a barbarian in a tie, but in this particular instance those dressed in what I consider appropriate garb for a Sunday Brunch at a nice hotel restaurant (admittedly, according to some possibly anachronistic idea of propriety), seemed to give me no reason to bat an eye, whilst those dressed in what I would consider disrespectful attire for the setting continued this perceived disrespect in their actions as well, amplifying the effect for me.  T-Shirt or Suit, there is no excuse for cutting in front of a lady in line, swearing loudly in public, or treating hotel staff disrespectfully.  </p>
<p>Condescension was certainly not, and never is, my intention, and I do honestly appreciate your desire to set the record straight here and figure this thing out.  I hope this has shed some light on why I said what I said, and why although I do not mean it in the way in which it may have been interpreted, I do mean the underlying point quite strongly: respect is important and is never anachronistic, no matter how it is dressed.</p>
<p>-Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://www.thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesimplyrefined.com/lasting-luxury-2/#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Pulvirent, I&#039;m curious as to why you felt the need to delete my previous comment without responding to it. It seems I may have offended you when I referred to your clothing style as &quot;anachronistic,&quot; and for that I apologize. Although your personal style isn&#039;t for me, I don&#039;t have a problem with the clothing you choose to wear. You, on the other hand, DO seem to have a problem with the clothing other people choose to wear, and as you appear to be a very smart gentleman with an impressive ability to express yourself through writing, I merely intended to prompt you to give us some of your impressions on this issue. I look forward to hearing your response.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-George L.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pulvirent, I&#39;m curious as to why you felt the need to delete my previous comment without responding to it. It seems I may have offended you when I referred to your clothing style as &quot;anachronistic,&quot; and for that I apologize. Although your personal style isn&#39;t for me, I don&#39;t have a problem with the clothing you choose to wear. You, on the other hand, DO seem to have a problem with the clothing other people choose to wear, and as you appear to be a very smart gentleman with an impressive ability to express yourself through writing, I merely intended to prompt you to give us some of your impressions on this issue. I look forward to hearing your response.</p>
<p>-George L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
